Research Article | Open Access | Download PDF
Volume 4 | Issue 8 | Year 2013 | Article Id. IJCTT-V4I8P194 | DOI : https://doi.org/10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V4I8P194
A Review: Wireless Sensor Networks and Its Application, Platforms, Standards and Tools
K.Sarammal, R.A.Roseline
Citation :
K.Sarammal, R.A.Roseline, "A Review: Wireless Sensor Networks and Its Application, Platforms, Standards and Tools," International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT), vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 2905-2911, 2013. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V4I8P194
Abstract
Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) is formed by a large number of networked sensing nodes. The main goal of a WSN is to produce meaningful information from raw local data collected by individual sensors. The low cost, flexibility, fault tolerance, high sensing fidelity, and rapid deployment characteristics of sensor networks create many new and exciting application areas for remote sensing. In this paper, a survey on Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) and their architecture, applications, standards in WSN are carried out. Further, the test beds used in WSNs and network tools are surveyed.
Keywords
Wireless Sensor Network, Sensor Nodes, Applications, Standards, Test beds, Network tools.
References
[1]. Jennifer Yick, Biswanath Mukherjee, Dipak Ghosal. “Wireless sensor network survey” Department of Computer Science, University of California, Davis, CA95616, United State. 2008.
[2]. Kriti Jain, Upasana Bahuguna, “Survey on Wireless Sensor Network”, Tulas Institute, Dehradun, India, 2012.
[3]. I.F. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam, E. Cayirci, “A survey on sensor networks”, IEEE Communications Magazine 40 (8) (2002) 102–114.
[4]. Mokhtar Aboelaze, Fadi Aloul, “Current and Future trends in Sensor Networks: A Survey”.
[5] I.F. Akyildiz, W.J. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam, E. Cayirci, Wireless sensor networks: a survey, Computer Networks 38 (2002) 393–422.
[6] M. Leopold, M.B. Dydensborg, P. Bonnet, Bluetooth and sensor networks: a reality checks, in: Proceedings of the Sensys’03, Los Angeles, CA, 2003.
[7] L. Gu, D. Jia, P. Vicaire, T. Yan, L. Luo, A. Tirumala, Q. Cao, T. he, J.A. Stankovic, T. Abdelzaher, B.H. Krogh, Lightweight detection and classification for wireless sensor networks in realistic environment, in: Proceedings of the Sensys’05, Los Angeles, CA, 2005.
[8] I. Howitt, J.A. Gutierrez, IEEE802.15.4 low rate-wireless personal area network coexistence issues, Wireless Communications and Networking 3 (2003) 1481–1486.
[9] ZigBee: wireless control that simply works, <http://www.zigbee. org>.
[10] ZigBee Standards Overview, <http://www.freescale.com/webapp/ sps/site/overview.jsp?nodeId=01J4Fs25657725>.
[11] HART – The Logical Wireless Solution, <http:// www.hartcomm2.org/hart_protocol/wireless_hart/ hart_the_logical_solution.html>.
[12] Draft standard: What’s in the April’07 WirelessHART specification, <http://www.controleng.com/article/CA6427951.html>.
[13] G. Mulligan, L.W. Group, The 6LoWPAN architecture, in: Proceedings of the EmNets, Cork, Ireland, 2007.
[14] IEEE Standard 802.15.3, Wireless medium access controls (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications for high rate wireless person area networks (WPANs), September 2003.
[15] Wibree, <http://www.wibree.com/>. [16] J. Newsome, D. Song, GEM: Graph EMbedding for routing and data centric storage in sensor networks without geographic information in: Proceedings of the Sensys’03, San Diego, CA, 2003. [17] G. Werner-Allen, P. Swieskowski, M. Welsh, MoteLab: a wireless sensor network testbed, in: ISPN, 2005.
[18] D. Raychaudhuri, I. Seskar, M. Ott, S. Ganu, K. Ramachandran, H. Kremo, R. Siracusa, H. Liu, M. Singh, Overview of the ORBIT radio grid testbed for evaluation of next-generation wireless network protocols, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, 2005.
[19] Nurul I. Sarkar, Senior Member, IEEE and Syafnidar A. Halim, “A Review of Simulation of Telecommunication Networks: Simulators, Classification, Comparison, Methodologies, and Recommendations”.